Maxwell v. Horwood's Trustees [1902] ScotLR 39_341 (30 January 1902)
Jurisdiction in the Sheriff Court over a contract relating to heritable property within the sheriffdom requires personal citation of the defender within the sheriffdom; mere ownership of property or the making/performance of the contract within the sheriffdom is insufficient.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [1902] ScotLR 39_341
- Parties
- Pursuer/appellant: Thomas Maxwell; Defenders/respondents: Reverend Faulknor Russell Horwood and John Patrick Wright (Horwood's Trustees)
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 30 January 1902
- Procedural Posture
- Civil—jurisdictional Challenge in Contract/lease Dispute / Appeal From Sheriff Court to Court of Session, Inner House
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; action dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
- Legal Topics
- Sheriff Court Jurisdiction, Personal Citation, Jurisdiction Ratione Contractus, Lease Disputes, Heritable Property and Jurisdiction
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Thomas Maxwell
Pursuer/appellant
Reverend Faulknor Russell Horwood and John Patrick Wright (Horwood's Trustees)
Defenders/respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil—jurisdictional Challenge in Contract/lease Dispute / Appeal From Sheriff Court to Court of Session, Inner House
Legal Issues
- 1 Does the Sheriff Court have jurisdiction ratione contractus over defenders not resident in the sheriffdom and not personally cited within it, where the contract relates to heritable property within the sheriffdom?
- 2 Does ownership of heritage within a sheriffdom confer jurisdiction absent personal citation?
Ratio Decidendi
Jurisdiction in the Sheriff Court over a contract relating to heritable property within the sheriffdom requires personal citation of the defender within the sheriffdom; mere ownership of property or the making/performance of the contract within the sheriffdom is insufficient.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; action dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
Orders
- Sustained first plea-in-law for defenders (no jurisdiction)
- Dismissed the action
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment