Macnab v. Nelsons [1909] ScotLR 817 (04 June 1909)
The Sheriff-Substitute was within his rights to extend the time for lodging defences after expiry of the statutory period under Rule 56; counterclaim is not competent where the original action is merely declaratory and not pecuniary.
- Citation
- [1909] ScotLR 817
- Parties
- Pursuer: John Macnab of Kinglassie, Fifeshire; Defenders: John Nelson and David Nelson
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 04 June 1909
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Sheriff Court / Final Judgment by Court of Session Inner House
- Outcome
- Interlocutors of Sheriff and Sheriff-Substitute recalled; declarator granted; action dismissed quoad ultra; expenses awarded as specified.
- Legal Topics
- Sheriff Court Procedure, Prorogation of Time, Counterclaim, Lease Irritancy, Declaratory Actions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Macnab of Kinglassie, Fifeshire
Pursuer
John Nelson and David Nelson
Defenders
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Sheriff Court / Final Judgment by Court of Session Inner House
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Sheriff has power under Rule 56 of the Sheriff Courts (Scotland) Act 1907 to prorogate time for lodging pleadings after expiry of the statutory period
- 2 Competency of counterclaim in a declaratory action where the original claim is not pecuniary
Ratio Decidendi
The Sheriff-Substitute was within his rights to extend the time for lodging defences after expiry of the statutory period under Rule 56; counterclaim is not competent where the original action is merely declaratory and not pecuniary.
Court Disposition
Interlocutors of Sheriff and Sheriff-Substitute recalled; declarator granted; action dismissed quoad ultra; expenses awarded as specified.
Orders
- Recall interlocutors of Sheriff and Sheriff-Substitute dated 29 September 1908 and 11 July 1908
- Find and declare in terms of the declaratory conclusion of the action
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment