BRIGGS MARINE CONTRACTORS LTD AGAINST BAKKAFROST SCOTLAND LTD [2024] ScotCS CSOH_63 (21 June 2024)
Section 10 of the 2010 Act requires the court to sist proceedings where an arbitration agreement applies, and does not require the court to assess the utility of the action after sisting; the action should remain sisted pending the outcome of the arbitration unless there is unconscionable delay or want of prosecution.
- Citation
- [2024] ScotCS CSOH_63
- Parties
- Pursuer: Briggs Marine Contractors Limited; Defender: Bakkafrost Scotland Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 21 June 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Action / Post Sist, Motion to Dismiss or Continue Sist
- Outcome
- Defender's motion to dismiss refused; action withdrawn from commercial roll and appointed to proceed as an ordinary action; sisted for one year with a by order hearing to follow.
- Legal Topics
- Sist of Proceedings, Arbitration Agreement, Jurisdiction, Case Management
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Briggs Marine Contractors Limited
Pursuer
Bakkafrost Scotland Limited
Defender
Procedural Posture
Commercial Action / Post Sist, Motion to Dismiss or Continue Sist
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court should dismiss or continue to sist an action where arbitration is ongoing under section 10 of the Arbitration (Scotland) Act 2010
- 2 Whether section 10 requires indefinite sisting of proceedings pending arbitration
Ratio Decidendi
Section 10 of the 2010 Act requires the court to sist proceedings where an arbitration agreement applies, and does not require the court to assess the utility of the action after sisting; the action should remain sisted pending the outcome of the arbitration unless there is unconscionable delay or want of prosecution.
Court Disposition
Defender's motion to dismiss refused; action withdrawn from commercial roll and appointed to proceed as an ordinary action; sisted for one year with a by order hearing to follow.
Orders
- Refused defender's motion to dismiss the action.
- Withdrew action from commercial roll under RCS 47.9.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment