Moffat v. Coats [1906] ScotLR 44_20 (06 November 1906)

The occasion was privileged as the statement was made by an uncle to a mother regarding her son's companion, and there was no evidence of malice; therefore, the statement was not actionable.

Citation: [1906] ScotLR 44_20
Parties: Pursuer: John Moffat; Defender: George Coats
Jurisdiction: Scotland
Judgment Date: 06 November 1906
Procedural Posture: Action of Damages for Slander / Jury Trial Before the Lord President and a Jury, Verdict Delivered
Outcome: Verdict for the defender on both issues
Legal Topics: Slander, Privilege, Malice, Reparation

Tort Defamation Slander Privilege Malice Reparation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Parties

John Moffat

Pursuer

George Coats

Defender

Procedural Posture

Action of Damages for Slander / Jury Trial Before the Lord President and a Jury, Verdict Delivered

Legal Issues

1 Whether the statement made by the defender was slanderous and actionable
2 Whether the occasion was privileged, requiring proof of malice
3 Whether the statement was made maliciously

Ratio Decidendi

The occasion was privileged as the statement was made by an uncle to a mother regarding her son's companion, and there was no evidence of malice; therefore, the statement was not actionable.

Court Disposition

Verdict for the defender on both issues

Orders

Pursuer failed to prove malice; defender found not liable for slander; action dismissed