SEAMLESS ROOFING v. MR JAMES SMITH and MRS RENA SMITH [2000] ScotSC 7 (11th April, 2000)
The third paragraph of the note of appeal potentially raises an issue of law—namely, whether no sheriff acting reasonably could have reached the decision to absolve the defender from liability—justifying remittal for a draft stated case.
- Citation
- [2000] ScotSC 7
- Parties
- Pursuer and Appellant: Seamless Roofing; Defender and Respondent: Mr James Smith; Defender and Respondent: Mrs Rena Smith
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Procedural Posture
- Small Claim Appeal / Appeal Against Sheriff's Decision; Remittal for Draft Stated Case
- Outcome
- Remitted to Sheriff to prepare draft stated case within fourteen days.
- Legal Topics
- Small Claims Procedure, Appeal Process, Draft Stated Case, Specification of Points of Law
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Seamless Roofing
Pursuer and Appellant
Mr James Smith
Defender and Respondent
Mrs Rena Smith
Defender and Respondent
Procedural Posture
Small Claim Appeal / Appeal Against Sheriff's Decision; Remittal for Draft Stated Case
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the note of appeal specified a point of law sufficient to require the Sheriff to prepare a draft stated case
Ratio Decidendi
The third paragraph of the note of appeal potentially raises an issue of law—namely, whether no sheriff acting reasonably could have reached the decision to absolve the defender from liability—justifying remittal for a draft stated case.
Court Disposition
Remitted to Sheriff to prepare draft stated case within fourteen days.
Orders
- Remit to Sheriff Powrie to issue a draft stated case within fourteen days and thereafter to proceed as accords.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment