Davidson's Trustees v. Davidson [1912] ScotLR 546 (09 March 1912)
The Court held that the proper method of stating questions of law in a special case requires skill, care, and discrimination, with questions embodying legal propositions rather than facts or arithmetic, and that it is not the Court's duty to investigate all possible legal aspects ex proprio motu but to answer the questions presented by the parties.
- Citation
- [1912] ScotLR 546
- Parties
- First Parties: George Gilbert Ramsay and others, trustees of the late Miss Grace Davidson, Rannagulzion, Perthshire; Other Parties: Davidson and others
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 09 March 1912
- Procedural Posture
- Special Case / Opinion and Judgment of the Court of Session
- Outcome
- Opinion delivered; observations made on practice and procedure.
- Legal Topics
- Special Case, Questions of Law, Formulation of Legal Issues
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
George Gilbert Ramsay and others, trustees of the late Miss Grace Davidson, Rannagulzion, Perthshire
First Parties
Davidson and others
Other Parties
Procedural Posture
Special Case / Opinion and Judgment of the Court of Session
Legal Issues
- 1 Proper method of stating questions of law in a special case
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held that the proper method of stating questions of law in a special case requires skill, care, and discrimination, with questions embodying legal propositions rather than facts or arithmetic, and that it is not the Court's duty to investigate all possible legal aspects ex proprio motu but to answer the questions presented by the parties.
Court Disposition
Opinion delivered; observations made on practice and procedure.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment