Masterton (AP) v Health Centre Kirkliston & Anor [2000] ScotCS 32 (2 February 2000)
The pursuer failed to prove on the balance of probabilities that earlier referral and treatment would have prevented his paraplegia; the risk was always present and not materially increased by any delay attributable to the defenders.
- Citation
- [2000] ScotCS 32
- Parties
- Pursuer: James Samson Masterton (AP); Defender: The Health Centre Kirkliston; Defender: Dr Robert M. Milne
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 02 February 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Medical Negligence / Judgment After Proof (trial)
- Outcome
- Decree of absolvitor (defenders absolved of liability)
- Legal Topics
- Standard of Care, Causation, Damages, Duty to Refer, General Practitioner Liability
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
James Samson Masterton (AP)
Pursuer
The Health Centre Kirkliston
Defender
Dr Robert M. Milne
Defender
Procedural Posture
Civil Medical Negligence / Judgment After Proof (trial)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Dr Milne was negligent in failing to refer the pursuer to a specialist earlier
- 2 Whether earlier referral would, on the balance of probabilities, have prevented the pursuer's paraplegia
Ratio Decidendi
The pursuer failed to prove on the balance of probabilities that earlier referral and treatment would have prevented his paraplegia; the risk was always present and not materially increased by any delay attributable to the defenders.
Court Disposition
Decree of absolvitor (defenders absolved of liability)
Orders
- Action dismissed; no damages awarded to pursuer.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment