TAYLOR AND OTHERS AGAINST DAILLY HEALTH CENTRE AND OTHERS [2018] ScotCS CSOH_91 (04 September 2018)
Dr Malloch did not depart from usual and normal practice and did not fall below the standard reasonably to be expected of an ordinarily competent general practitioner exercising reasonable skill and care. The symptoms presented were not consistent with a cardiac cause or pulmonary embolism, and the decision not to refer Mrs Taylor to hospital was not negligent. The duty to obtain informed consent under Montgomery does not extend to the exercise of professional judgment in diagnosis.
- Citation
- [2018] ScotCS CSOH_91
- Parties
- Pursuers: Jerry Taylor and Others; Defenders: Dailly Health Centre and Others
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 04 September 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Medical Negligence / Proof on Liability Only
- Outcome
- Action dismissed; decree of absolvitor granted in favour of defenders.
- Legal Topics
- Standard of Care, Professional Negligence, Duty to Refer for Emergency Treatment, Informed Consent, Interpretation of Medical Evidence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jerry Taylor and Others
Pursuers
Dailly Health Centre and Others
Defenders
Procedural Posture
Civil Medical Negligence / Proof on Liability Only
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Dr Malloch was negligent in failing to refer Mrs Taylor to hospital for possible acute coronary syndrome or pulmonary embolism
- 2 Whether Dr Malloch failed to obtain informed consent as required by Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board
Ratio Decidendi
Dr Malloch did not depart from usual and normal practice and did not fall below the standard reasonably to be expected of an ordinarily competent general practitioner exercising reasonable skill and care. The symptoms presented were not consistent with a cardiac cause or pulmonary embolism, and the decision not to refer Mrs Taylor to hospital was not negligent. The duty to obtain informed consent under Montgomery does not extend to the exercise of professional judgment in diagnosis.
Court Disposition
Action dismissed; decree of absolvitor granted in favour of defenders.
Orders
- Sustain defenders’ second and third pleas in law.
- Repel pursuers’ pleas.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment