RECLAIMING MOTION BY LC MANAGEMENT SERVICES (SCOTLAND) LTD AND OTHERS AGAINST HIGHLANDS AND ISLANDS ENTERPRISE [2020] ScotCS CSIH_37 (30 June 2020)
The notification threshold under Article 6(2) GBER is €15m, calculated as 75% of the standard aid threshold (20%) applied to €100m. The awards did not exceed this threshold and were lawful. The £1.64m award complied with the scheme as HIE reasonably determined market failure. The damages claim was unspecific and causation was not established.
- Citation
- [2020] ScotCS CSIH_37
- Parties
- Pursuers and Reclaimers: LC Management Services (Scotland) Ltd & Ors; Defenders and Respondents: Highlands and Islands Enterprise
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 30 June 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Reclaiming Motion (appeal) / Inner House, Court of Session, Post Commercial Judge's Interlocutor
- Outcome
- Reclaiming motion refused; interlocutor of commercial judge adhered to.
- Legal Topics
- State Aid Notification Thresholds, Regional Investment Aid, General Block Exemption Regulation, Market Failure, Damages for Breach of EU Law
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
LC Management Services (Scotland) Ltd & Ors
Pursuers and Reclaimers
Highlands and Islands Enterprise
Defenders and Respondents
Procedural Posture
Reclaiming Motion (appeal) / Inner House, Court of Session, Post Commercial Judge's Interlocutor
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the state aid awards to Global Energy Nigg Ltd exceeded the notification threshold under Article 6(2) GBER and required notification to the European Commission
- 2 Whether the £1.64m award complied with the Scottish Property Support Scheme and EU law
- 3 Whether LCMS is entitled to damages for alleged breach of EU state aid law
Ratio Decidendi
The notification threshold under Article 6(2) GBER is €15m, calculated as 75% of the standard aid threshold (20%) applied to €100m. The awards did not exceed this threshold and were lawful. The £1.64m award complied with the scheme as HIE reasonably determined market failure. The damages claim was unspecific and causation was not established.
Court Disposition
Reclaiming motion refused; interlocutor of commercial judge adhered to.
Orders
- Refusal of reclaiming motion
- No reference to the CJEU under Article 267 TFEU
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment