Whyte v. Bruce [1900] ScotLR 37_614 (20 March 1900)
Section 366 of the Glasgow Police Act 1866 does not apply to alterations or additions to existing buildings exceeding 6 feet in height which have existed without challenge for a number of years; it applies only to new erections. North Woodside Road remains a statute-labour road for the purposes of the Act, but the restrictive provision does not bar the respondent's proposed alterations.
- Citation
- [1900] ScotLR 37_614
- Parties
- Appellant (master of Works, Glasgow): John Whyte; Respondent (proprietor): John Wilson Bruce
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 20 March 1900
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Dean of Guild Court (building Warrant Objection) / Inner House, First Division, Court of Session (final Judgment)
- Outcome
- Appeal refused; judgment of Dean of Guild affirmed.
- Legal Topics
- Statutory Construction, Building Restrictions, Burgh Police, Statute Labour Roads, Alterations to Existing Buildings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Whyte
Appellant (master of Works, Glasgow)
John Wilson Bruce
Respondent (proprietor)
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Dean of Guild Court (building Warrant Objection) / Inner House, First Division, Court of Session (final Judgment)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether North Woodside Road is a statute-labour road within the meaning of section 366 of the Glasgow Police Act 1866.
- 2 Whether section 366 prohibits the Dean of Guild from granting a warrant for alterations/additions to existing buildings exceeding 6 feet in height within 20 feet of the centre of a statute-labour road.
Ratio Decidendi
Section 366 of the Glasgow Police Act 1866 does not apply to alterations or additions to existing buildings exceeding 6 feet in height which have existed without challenge for a number of years; it applies only to new erections. North Woodside Road remains a statute-labour road for the purposes of the Act, but the restrictive provision does not bar the respondent's proposed alterations.
Court Disposition
Appeal refused; judgment of Dean of Guild affirmed.
Orders
- Warrant granted to respondent to make alterations and erect additions as per plans, subject to tradesmanlike execution.
- Master of Works liable to respondent for expenses caused by opposition.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment