Edinburgh Magistrates v. Lord Advocate [1912] ScotLR 873 (26 June 1912)
Section 78 of the Edinburgh Corporation Act 1906 exempts Crown property from the building restrictions in section 67, and this exemption applies not only to existing buildings but also to future buildings and extensions. The Corporation was not entitled to enforce the restriction against the Crown, and the prior conduct in the Dean of Guild Court did not bar the Crown from completing the building. The interlocutor of the Lord Ordinary was recalled and the defender assoilzied.
- Citation
- [1912] ScotLR 873
- Parties
- Pursuer: Lord Provost, Magistrates, and Council of the City of Edinburgh; Defender: His Majesty's Advocate (representing the Commissioners of His Majesty's Works and Public Buildings)
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 26 June 1912
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Appeal (reclaiming Motion) From Lord Ordinary's Interlocutor
- Outcome
- Defender assoilzied (absolved from conclusions of the summons); Lord Ordinary's interlocutor recalled.
- Legal Topics
- Statutory Interpretation, Crown Exemption, Building Regulations, Municipal Powers, Bar/estoppel
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lord Provost, Magistrates, and Council of the City of Edinburgh
Pursuer
His Majesty's Advocate (representing the Commissioners of His Majesty's Works and Public Buildings)
Defender
Procedural Posture
Civil / Appeal (reclaiming Motion) From Lord Ordinary's Interlocutor
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the exemption in section 78 of the Edinburgh Corporation Act 1906 applies to future buildings or only to existing buildings vested in the Crown.
- 2 Whether the Corporation was barred from objecting to the completion of the building by its prior conduct in the Dean of Guild Court.
- 3 Whether the Crown is bound by local statutory restrictions absent express words.
Ratio Decidendi
Section 78 of the Edinburgh Corporation Act 1906 exempts Crown property from the building restrictions in section 67, and this exemption applies not only to existing buildings but also to future buildings and extensions. The Corporation was not entitled to enforce the restriction against the Crown, and the prior conduct in the Dean of Guild Court did not bar the Crown from completing the building. The interlocutor of the Lord Ordinary was recalled and the defender assoilzied.
Court Disposition
Defender assoilzied (absolved from conclusions of the summons); Lord Ordinary's interlocutor recalled.
Orders
- Recall of Lord Ordinary's interlocutor.
- Assoilzies the defender from the conclusions of the summons.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment