Robertson v. Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd [2007] ScotSC 21 (28 May 2007)
The statutory right to an accommodation crossing under section 60 of the 1845 Act is not extinguished by division of ownership and persists upon reunification. The defenders have a continuing statutory obligation to restore and maintain the crossing. The pleadings regarding drainage obligations are sufficiently specified for proof before answer.
- Citation
- [2007] ScotSC 21
- Parties
- Pursuer: Donald Hugh Robertson; Defender: Network Rail Infrastructure Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 28 May 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Interlocutor/summary Decree and Proof Before Answer
- Outcome
- Summary decree granted in favour of pursuer on level crossing issue; proof before answer allowed on drainage issue.
- Legal Topics
- Statutory Accommodation Crossings, Extinction of Statutory Rights, Obligations Under Railway Clauses Consolidation (scotland) Act 1845, Drainage Obligations, Liability for Acts of Contractors
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Donald Hugh Robertson
Pursuer
Network Rail Infrastructure Limited
Defender
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutor/summary Decree and Proof Before Answer
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether statutory right to accommodation crossing under section 60 of the Railway Clauses Consolidation (Scotland) Act 1845 is extinguished by division and subsequent reunification of land ownership
- 2 Whether defenders have continuing statutory obligation to restore and maintain level crossing
- 3 Adequacy of pleadings regarding drainage obligations and liability for acts of third parties
Ratio Decidendi
The statutory right to an accommodation crossing under section 60 of the 1845 Act is not extinguished by division of ownership and persists upon reunification. The defenders have a continuing statutory obligation to restore and maintain the crossing. The pleadings regarding drainage obligations are sufficiently specified for proof before answer.
Court Disposition
Summary decree granted in favour of pursuer on level crossing issue; proof before answer allowed on drainage issue.
Orders
- Defenders to restore the works forming the level crossing at the two points lettered 'G' in blue on the Title Plan for Title Number INV2804 within 90 days and maintain thereafter in terms of section 60 of the Railway Clauses Consolidation (Scotland) Act 1845.
- Both parties allowed proof before answer on remaining issues.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment