Birrell v Glasgow City Council [2015] ScotCS CSIH_21 (18 March 2015)
The licensing committee was entitled to refuse the application based on its own assessment of safety concerns, notwithstanding the existence of a VOSA certificate, and the sheriff erred in substituting his own view for that of the committee.
- Citation
- [2015] ScotCS CSIH_21
- Parties
- Appellant and Respondent: Robin Birrell; Respondents and Appellants: Glasgow City Council
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 18 March 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Opinion of the Court on Appeal From Sheriff's Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; sheriff's decision quashed; committee's refusal reinstated.
- Legal Topics
- Street Trading Licence, Local Authority Discretion, Vehicle Safety Standards, Judicial Review of Administrative Decisions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Robin Birrell
Appellant and Respondent
Glasgow City Council
Respondents and Appellants
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Opinion of the Court on Appeal From Sheriff's Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the licensing committee was entitled to refuse a street trader’s licence for a pedicab on safety grounds despite a VOSA certificate
- 2 Whether the sheriff erred in quashing the committee’s refusal and ordering the licence to be granted
Ratio Decidendi
The licensing committee was entitled to refuse the application based on its own assessment of safety concerns, notwithstanding the existence of a VOSA certificate, and the sheriff erred in substituting his own view for that of the committee.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; sheriff's decision quashed; committee's refusal reinstated.
Orders
- Uphold the appeal
- Quash the sheriff’s decision
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment