Smith v Buckett & Ors [2005] ScotSC 2 (05 January 2005)

Smith v Buckett & Ors [2005] ScotSC 2 (05 January 2005)

The pursuer was only required to comply with the approved plans and building regulations, as evidenced by the Completion Certificate. The defenders' evidence of defects was speculative and not supported by the approved plans or regulatory findings. Deductions claimed by defenders were not substantiated to the court's satisfaction. Summary decree is granted for the full sum claimed.

Citation
[2005] ScotSC 2
Parties
Pursuer: James Smith; First Defender: Mr Shaun Buckett; Second Defender: Mrs S. Buckett; Third Defender: Mr John Troup; Fourth Defender: Mrs Moira Troup
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
05 January 2005
Procedural Posture
Civil (building Contract Dispute) / Interlocutor on Motion for Summary Decree
Outcome
Summary decree granted in favour of the pursuer against the first and second defenders, jointly and severally.
Legal Topics
Summary Decree, Building Contracts, Material Breach, Completion Certificate, Defective Work
Contract Law Construction Law Summary Decree Building Contracts Material Breach Completion Certificate Defective Work

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

James Smith

Pursuer

Mr Shaun Buckett

First Defender

Mrs S. Buckett

Second Defender

Mr John Troup

Third Defender

Mrs Moira Troup

Fourth Defender

Procedural Posture

Civil (building Contract Dispute) / Interlocutor on Motion for Summary Decree

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the pursuer is entitled to summary decree for payment under a building contract
  2. 2 Whether alleged defects and incomplete works constitute a material defence to payment
  3. 3 Whether the issuance of a Completion Certificate is conclusive of contractual performance

Ratio Decidendi

The pursuer was only required to comply with the approved plans and building regulations, as evidenced by the Completion Certificate. The defenders' evidence of defects was speculative and not supported by the approved plans or regulatory findings. Deductions claimed by defenders were not substantiated to the court's satisfaction. Summary decree is granted for the full sum claimed.

Court Disposition

Summary decree granted in favour of the pursuer against the first and second defenders, jointly and severally.

Orders

  • Payment of £17,373.22 to the pursuer, comprising £11,917.77 (Crave 1) and £5,455.45 (Crave 2), with interest at 8% per annum from date of citation until payment.
  • All questions of expenses reserved.