Campbell's Trustees v. O'Neill [1910] ScotLR 115 (30 November 1910)
The process under section 37 of the Sheriff Courts (Scotland) Act 1907 is, in substance, an action of removing, not a summary ejection of a squatter. Therefore, section 44 of the Judicature Act 1825 applies, making appeal incompetent and limiting review to suspension. The notice of removal, though not specifying the precise date of Whitsunday, was valid as no prejudice was caused to the tenant, and the statutory meaning of Whitsunday was clear.
- Citation
- [1910] ScotLR 115
- Parties
- Pursuer/respondent: Richard Watson and another, trustees of the late Dr Campbell, Oban; Defender/appellant: Francis O'Neill, draper and clothier, 4 Argyll Square, Oban
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 30 November 1910
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Sheriff Court (summary Ejection/removing) / Inner House, First Division, Court of Session
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed as incompetent.
- Legal Topics
- Summary Ejection, Notice of Termination of Tenancy, Competency of Appeal, Sheriff Courts (scotland) Act 1907, Court of Session Act 1825
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Richard Watson and another, trustees of the late Dr Campbell, Oban
Pursuer/respondent
Francis O'Neill, draper and clothier, 4 Argyll Square, Oban
Defender/appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Sheriff Court (summary Ejection/removing) / Inner House, First Division, Court of Session
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an appeal is competent from a decree of summary ejection/removing under section 37 of the Sheriff Courts (Scotland) Act 1907, or whether review lies only by suspension under section 44 of the Judicature Act 1825.
- 2 Whether the notice of removal served on the tenant was valid despite not specifying the precise date of Whitsunday.
Ratio Decidendi
The process under section 37 of the Sheriff Courts (Scotland) Act 1907 is, in substance, an action of removing, not a summary ejection of a squatter. Therefore, section 44 of the Judicature Act 1825 applies, making appeal incompetent and limiting review to suspension. The notice of removal, though not specifying the precise date of Whitsunday, was valid as no prejudice was caused to the tenant, and the statutory meaning of Whitsunday was clear.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed as incompetent.
Orders
- Objection to competency of appeal sustained.
- Appeal dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment