SSE ENERGY SUPPLY LTD AGAINST STAG HOTEL LTD [2022] ScotCS CSOH_54 (10 August 2022)
The defender's pleadings are relevant only insofar as they specify the alleged inability of the meter to communicate and display accurate readings and battery failure; other unspecified defects are excluded due to lack of fair notice. The presumption of regularity may apply but its application depends on evidence. The defender's averments regarding reduced electricity use during Covid-19 and the offer to pay a reasonable estimate are not excluded. The defender's averment of breach of an unspecified statutory provision is excluded as irrelevant.
- Citation
- [2022] ScotCS CSOH_54
- Parties
- Pursuer: SSE Energy Supply Ltd; Defender: Stag Hotel Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 10 August 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Action (payment Claim) / Debate on Relevancy and Specification; Interlocutory Ruling
- Outcome
- Interlocutory order; partial exclusion of averments; proof before answer ordered
- Legal Topics
- Supply of Goods and Services, Burden of Proof, Presumptions in Evidence, Specification of Pleadings, Meter Accuracy Disputes, Contractual Remedies
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
SSE Energy Supply Ltd
Pursuer
Stag Hotel Ltd
Defender
Procedural Posture
Commercial Action (payment Claim) / Debate on Relevancy and Specification; Interlocutory Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defender's pleadings regarding meter defects and excessive charges are relevant and sufficiently specified
- 2 Whether the presumption omnia praesumuntur rite et solemniter acta esse applies to electricity meters in this context
- 3 Whether the defender's averments regarding reduced electricity use during Covid-19 are relevant
Ratio Decidendi
The defender's pleadings are relevant only insofar as they specify the alleged inability of the meter to communicate and display accurate readings and battery failure; other unspecified defects are excluded due to lack of fair notice. The presumption of regularity may apply but its application depends on evidence. The defender's averments regarding reduced electricity use during Covid-19 and the offer to pay a reasonable estimate are not excluded. The defender's averment of breach of an unspecified statutory provision is excluded as irrelevant.
Court Disposition
Interlocutory order; partial exclusion of averments; proof before answer ordered
Orders
- Sustain the pursuer's first plea-in-law and exclude from probation the defender's averments on breach of an unspecified statutory provision.
- Proof before answer on remaining issues.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment