Harrison v D M Hall & Ors [2001] ScotCS 235 (16 October 2001)

Harrison v D M Hall & Ors [2001] ScotCS 235 (16 October 2001)

The pursuer failed to prove that a visible defect existed at the time of the defenders' inspection, and the evidence did not establish that the defenders' valuation was outside the legitimate range of professional opinion. Therefore, no negligence was established on either ground.

Citation
[2001] ScotCS 235
Parties
Pursuer: Paul Harrison; Defenders: D M Hall and Others
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
16 October 2001
Procedural Posture
Civil Professional Negligence / Outer House, Court of Session Opinion After Proof
Outcome
Decree of absolvitor granted in favour of defenders; pursuer's claim dismissed.
Legal Topics
Surveyor's Duty of Care, Standard of Care, Valuation Negligence, Damages Assessment

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 10
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Paul Harrison

Pursuer

D M Hall and Others

Defenders

Procedural Posture

Civil Professional Negligence / Outer House, Court of Session Opinion After Proof

  1. 1 Whether the defenders were negligent in failing to detect and report rot and damp in the property.
  2. 2 Whether the defenders negligently over-valued the property.

Ratio Decidendi

The pursuer failed to prove that a visible defect existed at the time of the defenders' inspection, and the evidence did not establish that the defenders' valuation was outside the legitimate range of professional opinion. Therefore, no negligence was established on either ground.

Court Disposition

Decree of absolvitor granted in favour of defenders; pursuer's claim dismissed.

Orders

  • Sustain defenders' second and third pleas-in-law.
  • Repel pursuer's first plea-in-law.