Gupta v. Ross [2005] ScotCS CSIH_1 (11 January 2005)
A Note of Objections under Rule of Court 42.4 must specify particular items in the account taxed to which objection is taken; general criticisms of the Auditor or procedure are not competent grounds for objection. As the pursuer and appellant failed to specify any such items, the Note of Objections was incompetent and must be repelled.
- Citation
- [2005] ScotCS CSIH_1
- Parties
- Pursuer and Appellant: Arun Gupta; Defender and Respondent: Fiona Emma Ross
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 11 January 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Note of Objections to Auditor's Report in Civil Expenses Taxation / Appeal/hearing on Note of Objections
- Outcome
- Note of Objections repelled; appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Taxation of Costs, Court Procedure, Objections to Auditor's Report
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Arun Gupta
Pursuer and Appellant
Fiona Emma Ross
Defender and Respondent
Procedural Posture
Note of Objections to Auditor's Report in Civil Expenses Taxation / Appeal/hearing on Note of Objections
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Note of Objections by the pursuer and appellant was competently stated under Rule of Court 42.4
- 2 Whether objections to the Auditor's report must specify particular items in the account taxed
- 3 Whether general criticisms of the Auditor and procedure are competent in a Note of Objections
Ratio Decidendi
A Note of Objections under Rule of Court 42.4 must specify particular items in the account taxed to which objection is taken; general criticisms of the Auditor or procedure are not competent grounds for objection. As the pursuer and appellant failed to specify any such items, the Note of Objections was incompetent and must be repelled.
Court Disposition
Note of Objections repelled; appeal dismissed.
Orders
- Note of Objections by the pursuer and appellant repelled.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment