Centenary 6 LTD against TLT LLP (Court of Session) [2024] CSIH 29 (19 September 2024)
The court adopted the rule of thumb of 10% to 15% per head for calculating percentage uplifts in judicial expenses, generally capping the uplift at 100% in commercial litigation, but allowing departures in exceptional cases.
- Citation
- [2024] CSIH 29
- Parties
- Pursuers and Respondents: Centenary 6 Limited; Defenders and Reclaimers: TLT LLP
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 19 September 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Litigation / Post Appeal Expenses Determination
- Outcome
- Pursuers awarded expenses with specified uplifts; court clarified calculation method.
- Legal Topics
- Taxation of Judicial Expenses, Percentage Uplift, Rule of Thumb for Expenses
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Centenary 6 Limited
Pursuers and Respondents
TLT LLP
Defenders and Reclaimers
Procedural Posture
Commercial Litigation / Post Appeal Expenses Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate percentage uplift for judicial expenses under Taxation of Judicial Expenses Rules 2019
- 2 Application of rule of thumb for uplift calculation
- 3 Maximum permissible uplift in commercial litigation
Ratio Decidendi
The court adopted the rule of thumb of 10% to 15% per head for calculating percentage uplifts in judicial expenses, generally capping the uplift at 100% in commercial litigation, but allowing departures in exceptional cases.
Court Disposition
Pursuers awarded expenses with specified uplifts; court clarified calculation method.
Orders
- Pursuers awarded expenses in the Outer House with a 75% uplift under heads (a)-(c), (e), and (f) of paragraph 5.2 of the Taxation of Judicial Expenses Rules 2019.
- Pursuers awarded expenses of the reclaiming motion, modified to 90%, with a 30% uplift under heads (a) and (c).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment