Frost & Anor v Unity Trust Bank Plc [2000] ScotCS 231 (17 August 2000)

Frost & Anor v Unity Trust Bank Plc [2000] ScotCS 231 (17 August 2000)

None of the pursuers' submissions raised an issue appropriate for a reclaiming motion; there was no evidence of unfairness, bias, or procedural irregularity affecting the taxation of expenses or the interlocutors challenged.

Citation
[2000] ScotCS 231
Parties
Pursuer: Martin Frost and Another; Defender: Unity Trust Bank Plc
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
17 August 2000
Procedural Posture
Civil / Motion Hearing on Leave to Reclaim and to Sist Cause
Outcome
Motions refused
Legal Topics
Taxation of Expenses, Leave to Reclaim, Jurisdiction, Bias, Recording of Proceedings
Civil Procedure Taxation of Expenses Leave to Reclaim Jurisdiction Bias Recording of Proceedings

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Martin Frost and Another

Pursuer

Unity Trust Bank Plc

Defender

Procedural Posture

Civil / Motion Hearing on Leave to Reclaim and to Sist Cause

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether leave to reclaim interlocutors should be granted
  2. 2 Whether cause should be sisted pending outcome of another action
  3. 3 Whether auditor failed to account for payments already made

Ratio Decidendi

None of the pursuers' submissions raised an issue appropriate for a reclaiming motion; there was no evidence of unfairness, bias, or procedural irregularity affecting the taxation of expenses or the interlocutors challenged.

Court Disposition

Motions refused

Orders

  • Refused motion to sist cause
  • Refused leave to reclaim interlocutors