Webster v. Orkney Islands Council [2011] ScotSC 21 (1 May 2011)
The licensing authority erred in law by inverting the burden of proof and acted contrary to natural justice by failing to give the applicant adequate notice of the material to be relied upon, thereby rendering the decision to refuse the licences unlawful.
- Citation
- [2011] ScotSC 21
- Parties
- Pursuer: John David Webster; Defender: Orkney Islands Council
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 01 May 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Summary Application / Appeal Against Licensing Authority Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; licensing authority's decisions reversed.
- Legal Topics
- Taxi Licensing, Natural Justice, Burden of Proof, Procedural Fairness
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John David Webster
Pursuer
Orkney Islands Council
Defender
Procedural Posture
Summary Application / Appeal Against Licensing Authority Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the licensing authority erred in law by placing the burden of proof on the applicant
- 2 Whether the applicant was given adequate notice of the grounds for refusal
- 3 Whether the authority acted contrary to natural justice
Ratio Decidendi
The licensing authority erred in law by inverting the burden of proof and acted contrary to natural justice by failing to give the applicant adequate notice of the material to be relied upon, thereby rendering the decision to refuse the licences unlawful.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; licensing authority's decisions reversed.
Orders
- The pursuer's appeal is allowed against the decisions of the defenders on 3 August 2010 to refuse the applications for grant and renewal of taxi licences.
- The said decisions are reversed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment