Barclay v Renfrewshire Council [2001] ScotCS 84 (3 April 2001)
The licensing authority erred in law by refusing renewal of the appellant's taxi licence based on a policy adopted after the original grant; such a policy cannot constitute a 'good reason' for refusal under paragraph 5(3)(d) of Schedule 1 to the Civic Government (Scotland) Act 1982.
- Citation
- [2001] ScotCS 84
- Parties
- Pursuer and Appellant: Janet Barclay; Defenders and Respondents: Renfrewshire Council
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 03 April 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Sheriff Court Decision (licensing Refusal) / Appeal Judgment by Inner House, Court of Session
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; sheriff's decision recalled; case remitted for reconsideration of renewal application.
- Legal Topics
- Taxi Licence Renewal, Local Authority Policy, Statutory Interpretation, Legitimate Expectation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Janet Barclay
Pursuer and Appellant
Renfrewshire Council
Defenders and Respondents
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Sheriff Court Decision (licensing Refusal) / Appeal Judgment by Inner House, Court of Session
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a licensing authority can refuse renewal of a taxi licence based on a policy adopted after the original grant
- 2 Whether overprovision policy is a 'good reason' for refusal under paragraph 5(3)(d) of Schedule 1 to the Civic Government (Scotland) Act 1982
Ratio Decidendi
The licensing authority erred in law by refusing renewal of the appellant's taxi licence based on a policy adopted after the original grant; such a policy cannot constitute a 'good reason' for refusal under paragraph 5(3)(d) of Schedule 1 to the Civic Government (Scotland) Act 1982.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; sheriff's decision recalled; case remitted for reconsideration of renewal application.
Orders
- Recall the sheriff's interlocutor.
- Sustain the first plea-in-law for the appellant to the extent of holding the respondents erred in law.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment