Davies v. Renfrewshire Council & Anor [2005] ScotCS CSIH_17 (11 February 2005)

Davies v. Renfrewshire Council & Anor [2005] ScotCS CSIH_17 (11 February 2005)

The licensing authority erred in law by failing to exercise its general discretion under section 10(3) of the Civic Government (Scotland) Act 1982, considering only whether there was significant unmet demand in general and not whether special circumstances (such as unmet demand for disabled-access taxis) should lead to an exception. The authority must reconsider the applications, exercising its discretion in light of all relevant circumstances, including the needs of disabled persons.

Citation
[2005] ScotCS CSIH_17
Parties
Applicant and Now Respondent: Edwin Davies; First Respondents and Now Appellants: Renfrewshire Council; Second Respondents: Paisley and Glasgow Airport Taxis Limited
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
11 February 2005
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Sheriffdom (licensing Decision) / Appeal to Inner House, Court of Session
Outcome
Appeal allowed; sheriff's interlocutor recalled; case remitted for reconsideration by licensing authority
Legal Topics
Taxi Licensing, Discretion of Licensing Authorities, Interpretation of 'significant Unmet Demand', Disability Access Requirements, Statutory Construction
Administrative Law Licensing Law Disability Law Taxi Licensing Discretion of Licensing Authorities Interpretation of 'significant Unmet Demand' Disability Access Requirements Statutory Construction

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Edwin Davies

Applicant and Now Respondent

Renfrewshire Council

First Respondents and Now Appellants

Paisley and Glasgow Airport Taxis Limited

Second Respondents

Procedural Posture

Appeal From Sheriffdom (licensing Decision) / Appeal to Inner House, Court of Session

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether 'significant unmet demand' in section 10(3) of the Civic Government (Scotland) Act 1982 includes unmet demand from disabled persons for accessible taxis
  2. 2 Whether licensing authorities must consider specific unmet demand from segments of the population or only general demand
  3. 3 Whether the licensing authority exercised its statutory discretion correctly

Ratio Decidendi

The licensing authority erred in law by failing to exercise its general discretion under section 10(3) of the Civic Government (Scotland) Act 1982, considering only whether there was significant unmet demand in general and not whether special circumstances (such as unmet demand for disabled-access taxis) should lead to an exception. The authority must reconsider the applications, exercising its discretion in light of all relevant circumstances, including the needs of disabled persons.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; sheriff's interlocutor recalled; case remitted for reconsideration by licensing authority

Orders

  • Recall the interlocutor of the sheriff dated 8 January 2004
  • Sustain the sixth plea in law for the appellants