Superdrug Stores Plc v. Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd [2006] ScotCS CSIH_4 (27 January 2006)
The making of an application under section 1(1) of the Tenancy of Shops (Scotland) Act 1949 occurs when a procedurally valid summons and the appropriate fee are presented to the sheriff clerk, with an implied request for processing. Authentication of the summons is not required for the application to be made. Accordingly, the application in this case was made timeously on 16 December 2004.
- Citation
- [2006] ScotCS CSIH_4
- Parties
- Pursuer and Appellant: Superdrug Stores Plc; Defender and Respondent: Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 27 January 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal (summary Cause) / Inner House, Court of Session (from Sheriff Principal)
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; cross-appeal refused.
- Legal Topics
- Tenancy Renewal, Time Bar, Summary Cause Procedure, Application to Sheriff, Authentication of Summons
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Superdrug Stores Plc
Pursuer and Appellant
Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd
Defender and Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal (summary Cause) / Inner House, Court of Session (from Sheriff Principal)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether presentation of a summary cause summons and fee to the sheriff clerk constitutes a timeous 'application' under section 1(1) of the Tenancy of Shops (Scotland) Act 1949.
- 2 Whether authentication of the summons is required for an application to be made for statutory time bar purposes.
Ratio Decidendi
The making of an application under section 1(1) of the Tenancy of Shops (Scotland) Act 1949 occurs when a procedurally valid summons and the appropriate fee are presented to the sheriff clerk, with an implied request for processing. Authentication of the summons is not required for the application to be made. Accordingly, the application in this case was made timeously on 16 December 2004.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; cross-appeal refused.
Orders
- Remit to the sheriff to proceed as accords.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment