Hunter v. Tindale [2011] ScotSC 38 (22 July 2011)
The pend at 123 Constitution Street constitutes a 'sector' within the tenement building under the Tenements (Scotland) Act 2004, and the owner is liable to contribute to the cost of repairs to common property, including the pediment of the archway, regardless of whether the pend is a 'close'.
- Citation
- [2011] ScotSC 38
- Parties
- Pursuer & Appellant: Mr John Hunter; Defender & Respondent: Mrs Helen Tindale
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 22 July 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal (stated Case) From Small Claims Judgment / Appellate Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Tenements (scotland) Act 2004, Common Property Repairs, Liability for Maintenance, Definition of 'sector' and 'close'
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr John Hunter
Pursuer & Appellant
Mrs Helen Tindale
Defender & Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal (stated Case) From Small Claims Judgment / Appellate Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the pend at 123 Constitution Street forms part of the tenement building under the Tenements (Scotland) Act 2004
- 2 Whether the owner of the pend is liable for a share of common repair costs
- 3 Interpretation of 'close' and 'sector' under the Act
Ratio Decidendi
The pend at 123 Constitution Street constitutes a 'sector' within the tenement building under the Tenements (Scotland) Act 2004, and the owner is liable to contribute to the cost of repairs to common property, including the pediment of the archway, regardless of whether the pend is a 'close'.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Defender and Respondent liable to Pursuer and Appellant in the sum of £677 with interest at 8% from date of citation until payment
- Defender and Respondent liable for expenses of the small claims and appeal procedure
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment