M'Gregor's Trustees v. Kimbell [1911] ScotLR 950 (14 July 1911)
The exclusion clause in the settlement was intended only to protect the testamentary provisions and does not bar the widow from claiming jus relictæ in respect of estate falling into intestacy due to the operation of the Thellusson Act. The consistent line of authority, especially Naismith v. Boyes, compels the court to allow the widow's claim to one-half of the surplus income as jus relictæ.
- Citation
- [1911] ScotLR 950
- Parties
- First Parties: David Edward and another, trustees of the late James M'Gregor; Second Party: Mrs Alice Jeffs or M'Gregor or Kimbell, widow of James M'Gregor, now wife of William Alfred Kimbell; Third Parties: John M'Gregor and others, brothers, sisters, or descendants of brothers and sisters of James M'Gregor; Fourth Parties: William Jeffs and others, brothers, sisters, or descendants of brothers and sisters of Mrs Alice Jeffs or M'Gregor or Kimbell
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 14 July 1911
- Procedural Posture
- Special Case (succession) / Judgment of Inner House, Second Division, Court of Session
- Outcome
- Widow entitled to claim jus relictæ to one-half of the surplus income falling into intestacy after 26 November 1902, in addition to her conventional provision.
- Legal Topics
- Testamentary Dispositions, Partial Intestacy, Widow's Legal Rights (jus Relictæ), Provision to Widow, Interpretation of Exclusion Clauses
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
David Edward and another, trustees of the late James M'Gregor
First Parties
Mrs Alice Jeffs or M'Gregor or Kimbell, widow of James M'Gregor, now wife of William Alfred Kimbell
Second Party
John M'Gregor and others, brothers, sisters, or descendants of brothers and sisters of James M'Gregor
Third Parties
William Jeffs and others, brothers, sisters, or descendants of brothers and sisters of Mrs Alice Jeffs or M'Gregor or Kimbell
Fourth Parties
Procedural Posture
Special Case (succession) / Judgment of Inner House, Second Division, Court of Session
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a widow, who accepted provision in a will in lieu of legal rights, can claim jus relictæ out of estate falling into intestacy due to the Thellusson Act.
Ratio Decidendi
The exclusion clause in the settlement was intended only to protect the testamentary provisions and does not bar the widow from claiming jus relictæ in respect of estate falling into intestacy due to the operation of the Thellusson Act. The consistent line of authority, especially Naismith v. Boyes, compels the court to allow the widow's claim to one-half of the surplus income as jus relictæ.
Court Disposition
Widow entitled to claim jus relictæ to one-half of the surplus income falling into intestacy after 26 November 1902, in addition to her conventional provision.
Orders
- Third question of law answered in the affirmative: the widow is entitled, jure relictæ, to one-half of the surplus income after payment of her restricted annuity for each year since 26 November 1902 and so long as she survives.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment