Kinsey-Morgan's Trustees v. Campbell [1915] ScotLR 289 (08 January 1915)
The codicil's inaccurate recital did not revoke or alter the essential provisions of the trust-disposition and settlement; the widow's liferent remained alimentary and limited to one-half of the residue; the son's gift vested absolutely, and the codicil's latter part was merely an earnest request without legal effect.
- Citation
- [1915] ScotLR 289
- Parties
- First Parties: Mrs Campbell and others, testamentary trustees of Robert Campbell; Second Parties: Buchanan Campbell and another, antenuptial marriage-contract trustees of Mrs Kinsey-Morgan; Third Party: Mrs Kinsey-Morgan (Beatrice Campbell), only daughter of the deceased; Fourth Parties: Miss Beatrice Margaret Kinsey-Morgan and her father as guardian; Fifth Party: Mrs Campbell, widow of the deceased, as an individual; Sixth Party: Buchanan Campbell, only son of the deceased, as an individual
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 08 January 1915
- Procedural Posture
- Special Case for Opinion and Judgment / Court of Session Inner House Second Division, Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Questions of law answered: widow entitled to alimentary liferent of one-half residue; son's gift vested absolutely; codicil did not revoke or alter will.
- Legal Topics
- Testamentary Disposition, Codicil Interpretation, Revocation, Precatory Trust, Alimentary Liferent
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mrs Campbell and others, testamentary trustees of Robert Campbell
First Parties
Buchanan Campbell and another, antenuptial marriage-contract trustees of Mrs Kinsey-Morgan
Second Parties
Mrs Kinsey-Morgan (Beatrice Campbell), only daughter of the deceased
Third Party
Miss Beatrice Margaret Kinsey-Morgan and her father as guardian
Fourth Parties
Mrs Campbell, widow of the deceased, as an individual
Fifth Party
Buchanan Campbell, only son of the deceased, as an individual
Sixth Party
Procedural Posture
Special Case for Opinion and Judgment / Court of Session Inner House Second Division, Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the codicil revoked or altered the trust-disposition and settlement
- 2 Whether the widow was entitled to liferent of whole estate or only one-half
- 3 Whether the son's gift vested absolutely or was subject to precatory trust
Ratio Decidendi
The codicil's inaccurate recital did not revoke or alter the essential provisions of the trust-disposition and settlement; the widow's liferent remained alimentary and limited to one-half of the residue; the son's gift vested absolutely, and the codicil's latter part was merely an earnest request without legal effect.
Court Disposition
Questions of law answered: widow entitled to alimentary liferent of one-half residue; son's gift vested absolutely; codicil did not revoke or alter will.
Orders
- Answer branch (a) of first question in negative and branch (b) in affirmative; branch (c) unnecessary.
- Declare liferent for widow is alimentary allenarly.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment