Findleton v. Quarriers [2006] ScotCS CSOH_161 (10 October 2006)
Preliminary proof is appropriate for the time bar and section 19A issues, as these can be separated from the merits; there is no justification for departing from normal procedure; apology averments are irrelevant and excluded from probation.
- Citation
- [2006] ScotCS CSOH_161
- Parties
- Pursuer: Colin Findleton; Defenders: Quarriers
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 10 October 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injury Damages / Procedure Roll Hearing
- Outcome
- Pursuer's motion for proof before answer refused; preliminary proof allowed on time bar and section 19A pleas; apology averments excluded from probation.
- Legal Topics
- Time Bar, Section 17 and 19 a Prescription and Limitation (scotland) Act 1973, Child Abuse Claims, Procedural Discretion
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Colin Findleton
Pursuer
Quarriers
Defenders
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury Damages / Procedure Roll Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the action is time barred under section 17 of the Prescription and Limitation (Scotland) Act 1973
- 2 Whether the action should proceed under section 19A of the 1973 Act
- 3 Whether preliminary proof or proof before answer is appropriate
Ratio Decidendi
Preliminary proof is appropriate for the time bar and section 19A issues, as these can be separated from the merits; there is no justification for departing from normal procedure; apology averments are irrelevant and excluded from probation.
Court Disposition
Pursuer's motion for proof before answer refused; preliminary proof allowed on time bar and section 19A pleas; apology averments excluded from probation.
Orders
- Allow preliminary proof in respect of defenders' first and pursuer's third and fourth pleas in law (sections 17 and 19A of the 1973 Act).
- Exclude article 6 of Condescendence (apology averments) from probation.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment