Tor Corporate AS v. Siopect Group Start Petroleum Corp Ltd & Ors [2008] ScotCS CSIH_9 (18 January 2008)
A petition for judicial review is lodged, and thus the application to set aside an arbitral award is made, when the petition is physically accepted by the Petition Department without rejection or qualification, regardless of when it is date-stamped or registered; thus, the application in this case was made on 15 August 2006 and was timeous.
- Citation
- [2008] ScotCS CSIH_9
- Parties
- Petitioners and Reclaimers: Tor Corporate A. S.; First Respondents: Sinopec Group Star Petroleum Corporation Limited; Respondents: Second, Third and Fourth Respondents
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 18 January 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Reclaiming Motion in Petition for Judicial Review / Appeal From Lord Ordinary's Dismissal of Petition
- Outcome
- Reclaiming motion allowed; Lord Ordinary's interlocutor recalled; case remitted for further procedure.
- Legal Topics
- Time Limits for Setting Aside Arbitral Awards, Lodging and Presentation of Petitions, Interpretation of Procedural Rules
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tor Corporate A. S.
Petitioners and Reclaimers
Sinopec Group Star Petroleum Corporation Limited
First Respondents
Second, Third and Fourth Respondents
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Reclaiming Motion in Petition for Judicial Review / Appeal From Lord Ordinary's Dismissal of Petition
Legal Issues
- 1 When is an application to set aside an arbitral award 'made' for the purposes of Article 34(3) of the UNCITRAL Model Law?
- 2 Does the act of lodging a petition in the Petition Department constitute making the application, or is it only when the petition is date-stamped and registered?
Ratio Decidendi
A petition for judicial review is lodged, and thus the application to set aside an arbitral award is made, when the petition is physically accepted by the Petition Department without rejection or qualification, regardless of when it is date-stamped or registered; thus, the application in this case was made on 15 August 2006 and was timeous.
Court Disposition
Reclaiming motion allowed; Lord Ordinary's interlocutor recalled; case remitted for further procedure.
Orders
- Recall of Lord Ordinary's interlocutor dated 29 May 2007
- Remit to Lord Ordinary to proceed as accords
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment