Bathgate Heritor v. Russell [1908] ScotLR 714 (12 December 1908)

Bathgate Heritor v. Russell [1908] ScotLR 714 (12 December 1908)

The heritors, as a quasi corporation, have title to sue to protect the churchyard property from encroachment.

Citation
[1908] ScotLR 714
Parties
Complainers: Heritors of the Parish of Bathgate and John Wright, clerk to and as representing them; Respondents: William Russell and the Bathgate Corn Exchange Company
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
12 December 1908
Procedural Posture
Note of Suspension and Interdict / Plea to Title to Sue; Before Answer Allowed a Proof
Outcome
First plea-in-law for respondents repelled; proof allowed before answer; case subsequently settled.
Legal Topics
Title to Sue, Heritors' Rights, Churchyard Encroachment

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Heritors of the Parish of Bathgate and John Wright, clerk to and as representing them

Complainers

William Russell and the Bathgate Corn Exchange Company

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Note of Suspension and Interdict / Plea to Title to Sue; Before Answer Allowed a Proof

  1. 1 Whether the heritors and their clerk had title to sue in respect of proposed encroachments on the churchyard.

Ratio Decidendi

The heritors, as a quasi corporation, have title to sue to protect the churchyard property from encroachment.

Court Disposition

First plea-in-law for respondents repelled; proof allowed before answer; case subsequently settled.

Orders

  • First plea-in-law for respondents repelled
  • Proof allowed before answer