Nigel Lowe & Associates & Ors v John Mowlem Construction Plc [1998] ScotCS 30 (15 October 1998)
The defenders' plea of no title to sue cannot be sustained or repelled without inquiry because the pursuers have made relevant averments that they, as a partnership, were the contracting party; however, averments about prior dealings lack sufficient specification and are excluded from probation as they stand.
- Citation
- [1998] ScotCS 30
- Parties
- Pursuers: Nigel Lowe & Associates and Others; Defenders: John Mowlem Construction plc
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 15 October 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Procedure Roll Debate on Preliminary Pleas (title to Sue)
- Outcome
- Preliminary proof allowed on title to sue; certain averments excluded from probation; defenders' first plea repelled.
- Legal Topics
- Title to Sue, Partnerships, Business Names Act 1985, Specification of Pleadings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nigel Lowe & Associates and Others
Pursuers
John Mowlem Construction plc
Defenders
Procedural Posture
Civil / Procedure Roll Debate on Preliminary Pleas (title to Sue)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the pursuers have title to sue as the contracting party under the consultancy contract
- 2 Whether the pleadings are sufficiently specific regarding prior dealings and partnership status
Ratio Decidendi
The defenders' plea of no title to sue cannot be sustained or repelled without inquiry because the pursuers have made relevant averments that they, as a partnership, were the contracting party; however, averments about prior dealings lack sufficient specification and are excluded from probation as they stand.
Court Disposition
Preliminary proof allowed on title to sue; certain averments excluded from probation; defenders' first plea repelled.
Orders
- Repel defenders' first plea of consent.
- Sustain defenders' fourth plea to the extent of excluding from probation the pursuers' averments in article 1 at page 5 B-C of the Closed Record as further amended.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment