Bennett v Independent Insurance Co Ltd [2001] ScotCS 3 (9 January 2001)
The pursuer is entitled to decree of declarator in appropriate terms, as the issues are identical to those in the Aitken case except for the absence of the Unsatisfied Court Judgments clause, which does not affect the outcome.
- Citation
- [2001] ScotCS 3
- Parties
- Pursuer: Alexander Bennett; Defenders: Independent Insurance Company Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 09 January 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Action for Declarator and Payment Under Insurance Policy / Debate on Relevancy and Title to Sue
- Outcome
- Case put out By Order for discussion of the terms of the appropriate decree of declarator in favour of the pursuer.
- Legal Topics
- Title to Sue Under Insurance Policy, Employer's Liability, Liquidation and Unsatisfied Judgments
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Alexander Bennett
Pursuer
Independent Insurance Company Limited
Defenders
Procedural Posture
Civil Action for Declarator and Payment Under Insurance Policy / Debate on Relevancy and Title to Sue
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the pursuer has title to sue the insurer directly for payment under the policy after employer's liquidation
- 2 Whether the pursuer's averments are relevant and sufficiently specified
Ratio Decidendi
The pursuer is entitled to decree of declarator in appropriate terms, as the issues are identical to those in the Aitken case except for the absence of the Unsatisfied Court Judgments clause, which does not affect the outcome.
Court Disposition
Case put out By Order for discussion of the terms of the appropriate decree of declarator in favour of the pursuer.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment