Bennett v Independent Insurance Co Ltd [2001] ScotCS 3 (9 January 2001)

Bennett v Independent Insurance Co Ltd [2001] ScotCS 3 (9 January 2001)

The pursuer is entitled to decree of declarator in appropriate terms, as the issues are identical to those in the Aitken case except for the absence of the Unsatisfied Court Judgments clause, which does not affect the outcome.

Citation
[2001] ScotCS 3
Parties
Pursuer: Alexander Bennett; Defenders: Independent Insurance Company Limited
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
09 January 2001
Procedural Posture
Civil Action for Declarator and Payment Under Insurance Policy / Debate on Relevancy and Title to Sue
Outcome
Case put out By Order for discussion of the terms of the appropriate decree of declarator in favour of the pursuer.
Legal Topics
Title to Sue Under Insurance Policy, Employer's Liability, Liquidation and Unsatisfied Judgments

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Alexander Bennett

Pursuer

Independent Insurance Company Limited

Defenders

Procedural Posture

Civil Action for Declarator and Payment Under Insurance Policy / Debate on Relevancy and Title to Sue

  1. 1 Whether the pursuer has title to sue the insurer directly for payment under the policy after employer's liquidation
  2. 2 Whether the pursuer's averments are relevant and sufficiently specified

Ratio Decidendi

The pursuer is entitled to decree of declarator in appropriate terms, as the issues are identical to those in the Aitken case except for the absence of the Unsatisfied Court Judgments clause, which does not affect the outcome.

Court Disposition

Case put out By Order for discussion of the terms of the appropriate decree of declarator in favour of the pursuer.