Mackendrick v. National Union of Dock Labourers in Great Britain and Ireland [1910] ScotLR 17 (01 November 1910)
The union is liable for obligations properly incurred by its branch in the course of union business, including the guarantee for legal costs to the branch's appointed law agent, as the branch had authority to appoint and employ the agent and the guarantee was not ultra vires under the union's rules. Rule XII(10) did not apply to the employment of a law agent, and the guarantee covered both professional charges and outlays, including those of correspondents.
- Citation
- [1910] ScotLR 17
- Parties
- Pursuer: Alexander B. Mackendrick; Defender: National Union of Dock Labourers in Great Britain and Ireland
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 01 November 1910
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Appeal Judgment After Proof
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; interlocutor of Lord Ordinary recalled; defenders found liable to pursuer for costs, remit to Auditor to tax accounts.
- Legal Topics
- Trade Union Liability, Jurisdiction Over Foreign Registered Unions, Agency and Authority of Union Branches, Guarantee for Legal Costs, Interpretation of Union Rules
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Alexander B. Mackendrick
Pursuer
National Union of Dock Labourers in Great Britain and Ireland
Defender
Procedural Posture
Civil / Appeal Judgment After Proof
Legal Issues
- 1 Is the National Union of Dock Labourers, registered in England but with branches in Scotland, subject to the jurisdiction of the Scottish courts?
- 2 Does a branch of a trade union have authority to bind the union to a guarantee for legal costs incurred by its appointed law agent?
- 3 Does the guarantee cover both professional charges and outlays, including those of correspondents?
Ratio Decidendi
The union is liable for obligations properly incurred by its branch in the course of union business, including the guarantee for legal costs to the branch's appointed law agent, as the branch had authority to appoint and employ the agent and the guarantee was not ultra vires under the union's rules. Rule XII(10) did not apply to the employment of a law agent, and the guarantee covered both professional charges and outlays, including those of correspondents.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; interlocutor of Lord Ordinary recalled; defenders found liable to pursuer for costs, remit to Auditor to tax accounts.
Orders
- Recall Lord Ordinary's interlocutor
- Repel all defenders' pleas-in-law except first and ninth
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment