The Tartan Army Ltd v Sett GMBH & Ors [2015] ScotCS CSOH_141 (22 October 2015)
The pursuer's pleadings did not disclose any relevant case for holding the third defender personally liable for the acts of Alba Football Fans Limited. There were no averments of fraud, concealment, evasion of legal obligations, or participation by Mr Emerson in the infringing acts beyond his constitutional role as director and shareholder. Mere control and informality in a one-man company do not suffice for personal liability. Accordingly, the action against the third defender is irrelevant and should be dismissed.
- Citation
- [2015] ScotCS CSOH_141
- Parties
- Pursuer: The Tartan Army Limited; First Defender: Sett GMBH; Second Defender: Oliver Reifler; Third Defender: Iain Emerson; Fourth Defender: Alba Football Fans Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 22 October 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Intellectual Property Action / Debate on Relevancy of Pleadings Regarding Personal Liability of Third Defender
- Outcome
- Action against the third defender (Iain Emerson) dismissed as irrelevant, subject to further procedure discussion.
- Legal Topics
- Trademark Infringement, Passing Off, Personal Liability of Directors, Corporate Veil, Joint Tortfeasor Liability
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Tartan Army Limited
Pursuer
Sett GMBH
First Defender
Oliver Reifler
Second Defender
Iain Emerson
Third Defender
Alba Football Fans Limited
Fourth Defender
Procedural Posture
Intellectual Property Action / Debate on Relevancy of Pleadings Regarding Personal Liability of Third Defender
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the third defender (sole director/shareholder) can be held personally liable for alleged trademark infringement and passing off by the company (Alba Football Fans Limited)
- 2 Whether the pleadings disclose a relevant case for piercing the corporate veil or for joint tortfeasor liability
Ratio Decidendi
The pursuer's pleadings did not disclose any relevant case for holding the third defender personally liable for the acts of Alba Football Fans Limited. There were no averments of fraud, concealment, evasion of legal obligations, or participation by Mr Emerson in the infringing acts beyond his constitutional role as director and shareholder. Mere control and informality in a one-man company do not suffice for personal liability. Accordingly, the action against the third defender is irrelevant and should be dismissed.
Court Disposition
Action against the third defender (Iain Emerson) dismissed as irrelevant, subject to further procedure discussion.
Orders
- Case to be put out By Order for further procedure discussion before pronouncing interlocutor of dismissal.
- All questions of expenses reserved.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment