Accountant Of Court v Halifax Plc [1999] ScotCS 131 (28 May 1999)
Bankrupt borrowing members are not disqualified from benefit under the Transfer Agreement except where the Society has taken possession of security subjects. Their rights to free shares arose on vesting day and vested in the permanent trustee as acquirenda under section 32(6) of the Bankruptcy Act 1985. The Society and Halifax, having notice of sequestration, have no defence under the proviso to section 32(6).
- Citation
- [1999] ScotCS 131
- Parties
- Pursuer: The Accountant of Court; Defender: Halifax Plc
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 28 May 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Interlocutory Judgment on Relevancy and Pleadings
- Outcome
- Defenders' fourth plea in law repelled; Accountant allowed proof before answer of averments; quantum of damages to be determined.
- Legal Topics
- Transfer of Business, Distribution of Shares, Bankrupt Estate Rights, Trustee Entitlement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Accountant of Court
Pursuer
Halifax Plc
Defender
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory Judgment on Relevancy and Pleadings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether bankrupt borrowing members acquired rights to free shares on vesting day
- 2 Whether such rights constituted property or income under the Bankruptcy Act 1985
- 3 Whether Halifax is protected by the proviso to section 32(6) of the Bankruptcy Act 1985
Ratio Decidendi
Bankrupt borrowing members are not disqualified from benefit under the Transfer Agreement except where the Society has taken possession of security subjects. Their rights to free shares arose on vesting day and vested in the permanent trustee as acquirenda under section 32(6) of the Bankruptcy Act 1985. The Society and Halifax, having notice of sequestration, have no defence under the proviso to section 32(6).
Court Disposition
Defenders' fourth plea in law repelled; Accountant allowed proof before answer of averments; quantum of damages to be determined.
Orders
- Sustain pursuer's second and fifth pleas in law to the extent of repelling defenders' fourth plea in law.
- Repel defenders' second and fifth pleas in law by amendment or consent.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment