Bavaird & Ors v Sir Robert McAlpine Ltd & Ors [2013] ScotCS CSIH_98 (20 November 2013)
On a proper construction of the 1996 transfer order, the word 'liabilities' includes potential and contingent liabilities arising from acts done by EKDC prior to transfer, even if the actionable harm (damnum) occurred after the transfer. The statutory order expressly provides that acts done by EKDC are to be treated as done by the council, ensuring successor liability for post-transfer manifestation of industrial disease caused by pre-transfer exposure.
- Citation
- [2013] ScotCS CSIH_98
- Parties
- Pursuers and Reclaimers: Gordon David Bavaird and Others; First Defender (assoilzied): Sir Robert McAlpine Limited; Second Defender (non Participating): Watson Construction Limited; Third Defender (non Participating): James Laidlaw & Sons Limited; Fourth Defender and Respondent: South Lanarkshire Council
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 20 November 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injury (mesothelioma, Delict) / Appeal (reclaiming Motion) From Outer House to Inner House
- Outcome
- Reclaiming motion allowed; interlocutors of 5 and 15 October 2012 recalled; proof before answer allowed; case remitted to Lord Ordinary to proceed as accords; expenses reserved.
- Legal Topics
- Transfer of Liabilities on Dissolution of Statutory Bodies, Successor Liability for Industrial Disease, Construction of Statutory Instruments, Contingent and Potential Liabilities, Mesothelioma Claims, Asbestos Exposure, Local Authority Liability
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gordon David Bavaird and Others
Pursuers and Reclaimers
Sir Robert McAlpine Limited
First Defender (assoilzied)
Watson Construction Limited
Second Defender (non Participating)
James Laidlaw & Sons Limited
Third Defender (non Participating)
South Lanarkshire Council
Fourth Defender and Respondent
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury (mesothelioma, Delict) / Appeal (reclaiming Motion) From Outer House to Inner House
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether South Lanarkshire Council, as statutory successor to EKDC, is liable for delictual claims arising after the transfer, where the injury (mesothelioma) manifested post-transfer but the exposure occurred pre-transfer.
- 2 Whether the statutory transfer order encompassed potential or contingent liabilities not yet actionable at the time of transfer.
Ratio Decidendi
On a proper construction of the 1996 transfer order, the word 'liabilities' includes potential and contingent liabilities arising from acts done by EKDC prior to transfer, even if the actionable harm (damnum) occurred after the transfer. The statutory order expressly provides that acts done by EKDC are to be treated as done by the council, ensuring successor liability for post-transfer manifestation of industrial disease caused by pre-transfer exposure.
Court Disposition
Reclaiming motion allowed; interlocutors of 5 and 15 October 2012 recalled; proof before answer allowed; case remitted to Lord Ordinary to proceed as accords; expenses reserved.
Orders
- Recall interlocutors of 5 and 15 October 2012.
- Allow proof before answer.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment