Cathcart v. Baxter's Trustees [1920] ScotLR 233 (18 December 1920)
The investment in the Mexican Central Railway Securities Company debenture stock was within the express powers of the trustees under the trust deed, and there was no evidence of negligence in making or retaining the investment. Trustees are entitled to exercise their judgment and are not liable for mere errors of judgment when acting prudently and on advice.
- Citation
- [1920] ScotLR 233
- Parties
- Pursuer and Reclaimer: Alan Taylor Cathcart; Defenders and Respondents: Edward Armitstead Baxter of Kincaldrum and another (Baxter's Trustees)
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 18 December 1920
- Procedural Posture
- Action of Count, Reckoning, and Payment / Reclaiming Note (appeal) Against Interlocutor of Lord Ordinary
- Outcome
- Objections to the trustees' account repelled; action dismissed; interlocutor of Lord Ordinary recalled and regularised by consent.
- Legal Topics
- Trustee Investment Powers, Liability of Trustees, Negligence, Ultra Vires Acts, Duty to Realise Investments
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Alan Taylor Cathcart
Pursuer and Reclaimer
Edward Armitstead Baxter of Kincaldrum and another (Baxter's Trustees)
Defenders and Respondents
Procedural Posture
Action of Count, Reckoning, and Payment / Reclaiming Note (appeal) Against Interlocutor of Lord Ordinary
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the investment in Mexican Central Railway Securities Company debenture stock was within the trustees' powers under the trust deed
- 2 Whether the trustees were negligent in making or retaining the investment
- 3 Whether trustees had a duty to realise the investment when its value declined
Ratio Decidendi
The investment in the Mexican Central Railway Securities Company debenture stock was within the express powers of the trustees under the trust deed, and there was no evidence of negligence in making or retaining the investment. Trustees are entitled to exercise their judgment and are not liable for mere errors of judgment when acting prudently and on advice.
Court Disposition
Objections to the trustees' account repelled; action dismissed; interlocutor of Lord Ordinary recalled and regularised by consent.
Orders
- Recall the interlocutor of the Lord Ordinary
- Hold the accounts produced by defenders as the account called for in the summons
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment