Ilona & Ors v. RH Colin Robert Vaughan & Ors [2005] ScotCS CSOH_152 (15 November 2005)
The pursuers have title and interest to sue: the trustees of the No. 2 Scheme have a jus quaesitum tertio to enforce the transfer, and the Dowager Countess (personally and as executrix) may sue for her and her late husband's entitlement. The obligations are imprescriptible as they arise from a fiduciary relationship and relate to trust property. The obligation to transfer was unconditional and not subject to the scheme deficit being resolved. Written communications after 14 January 1998 constituted relevant acknowledgements, interrupting any prescription if it applied.
- Citation
- [2005] ScotCS CSOH_152
- Parties
- Pursuer: Angelika Ilona, The Dowager Countess of Cawdor; Pursuer: St Cross Trustees Limited; Defender: The Right Honourable Colin Robert Vaughan, Seventh Earl of Cawdor; Defender: Steve Rochford
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 15 November 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (court of Session, Scotland) / Procedure Roll (interlocutory Debate on Legal Pleas)
- Outcome
- Defenders' pleas-in-law on title and interest and prescription repelled; pursuers' pleas on relevancy of conditionality upheld; case put out By Order for further procedure.
- Legal Topics
- Trustee Obligations, Pension Scheme Transfers, Prescription (limitation of Actions), Title and Interest to Sue, Conditionality of Obligations
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Angelika Ilona, The Dowager Countess of Cawdor
Pursuer
St Cross Trustees Limited
Pursuer
The Right Honourable Colin Robert Vaughan, Seventh Earl of Cawdor
Defender
Steve Rochford
Defender
Procedural Posture
Civil (court of Session, Scotland) / Procedure Roll (interlocutory Debate on Legal Pleas)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the pursuers have title and interest to sue for enforcement of pension scheme transfer obligations
- 2 Whether the obligations are imprescriptible or subject to prescription under the Prescription and Limitation (Scotland) Act 1973
- 3 Whether the obligation to transfer was conditional on resolution of scheme deficit
Ratio Decidendi
The pursuers have title and interest to sue: the trustees of the No. 2 Scheme have a jus quaesitum tertio to enforce the transfer, and the Dowager Countess (personally and as executrix) may sue for her and her late husband's entitlement. The obligations are imprescriptible as they arise from a fiduciary relationship and relate to trust property. The obligation to transfer was unconditional and not subject to the scheme deficit being resolved. Written communications after 14 January 1998 constituted relevant acknowledgements, interrupting any prescription if it applied.
Court Disposition
Defenders' pleas-in-law on title and interest and prescription repelled; pursuers' pleas on relevancy of conditionality upheld; case put out By Order for further procedure.
Orders
- Defenders' pleas on title and interest and prescription repelled
- Pursuers' pleas on relevancy of conditionality upheld
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment