Boyd's Trustees v. Boyd and Others [1908] ScotLR 835 (11 July 1908)
Trustees are not entitled to retain shares with uncalled liability indefinitely at their pleasure, but may do so as long as they prudently consider it beneficial to the trust. The donation of income to Mrs Boyd was not revoked; however, arrears are only due from Whitsunday 1889 (the date up to which she acknowledged receipt), not before.
- Citation
- [1908] ScotLR 835
- Parties
- First Parties (testamentary Trustees): Boyd's Trustees; Second Party: James Lawrence Boyd (grand-nephew); Third Parties: Trustees under deed of trust in favour of Mrs Anne Mouat Hannay or Boyd
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 11 July 1908
- Procedural Posture
- Special Case (court of Session, Inner House, Second Division) / Judgment on Questions of Law Regarding Administration of Estate
- Outcome
- Partly in favour of third parties (trustees for Mrs Boyd) on entitlement to arrears from Whitsunday 1889; trustees' power to retain shares limited to prudent exercise, not indefinite retention at pleasure.
- Legal Topics
- Trustee Powers, Investment of Trust Funds, Revocation of Donation, Husband and Wife Property Rights, Implied Waiver
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Boyd's Trustees
First Parties (testamentary Trustees)
James Lawrence Boyd (grand-nephew)
Second Party
Trustees under deed of trust in favour of Mrs Anne Mouat Hannay or Boyd
Third Parties
Procedural Posture
Special Case (court of Session, Inner House, Second Division) / Judgment on Questions of Law Regarding Administration of Estate
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether trustees may retain shares with uncalled liability indefinitely under testamentary power
- 2 Whether Mrs Boyd (via her trustees) is entitled to arrears of income from trust fund, and from what date
- 3 Whether the donation to Mrs Boyd was revoked or waived
Ratio Decidendi
Trustees are not entitled to retain shares with uncalled liability indefinitely at their pleasure, but may do so as long as they prudently consider it beneficial to the trust. The donation of income to Mrs Boyd was not revoked; however, arrears are only due from Whitsunday 1889 (the date up to which she acknowledged receipt), not before.
Court Disposition
Partly in favour of third parties (trustees for Mrs Boyd) on entitlement to arrears from Whitsunday 1889; trustees' power to retain shares limited to prudent exercise, not indefinite retention at pleasure.
Orders
- First branch of first question answered in affirmative, deleting 'indefinitely at their pleasure'; second branch in negative.
- Branch (b) of question 2 answered in affirmative (arrears from Whitsunday 1889), deleting 'or any part thereof'; branches (a) and (c) in negative.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment