Coats' Trustees Petitioners [1914] ScotLR 642 (27 May 1914)
The Court authorised the sale of the specified pictures by public auction at not less than the appraised value, expressly permitting the trustee-beneficiary to bid, as this was consistent with the testator's intentions and the interests of the trust estate.
- Citation
- [1914] ScotLR 642
- Parties
- Petitioners: William Hodge Coats, John Alexander Spens, and Ernest Symington Coats (as Trustees of Archibald Coats)
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 27 May 1914
- Procedural Posture
- Petition for Special Powers Under Trust / Final Order on Petition
- Outcome
- Petition granted
- Legal Topics
- Trustee Powers, Sale of Trust Property, Nobile Officium, Beneficiary Rights
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
William Hodge Coats, John Alexander Spens, and Ernest Symington Coats (as Trustees of Archibald Coats)
Petitioners
Procedural Posture
Petition for Special Powers Under Trust / Final Order on Petition
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether trustees may be authorised to sell trust property by public auction with a trustee (beneficiary) permitted to bid
- 2 Whether such authorisation aligns with the testator's intentions and the interests of the trust estate
Ratio Decidendi
The Court authorised the sale of the specified pictures by public auction at not less than the appraised value, expressly permitting the trustee-beneficiary to bid, as this was consistent with the testator's intentions and the interests of the trust estate.
Court Disposition
Petition granted
Orders
- Authorise sale of specified pictures by public auction at Christie, Manson, & Woods, London, at not less than appraised values, with William Hodge Coats entitled to bid as an individual.
- Petitioners entitled to expenses out of the trust estate.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment