Ritchie v Burns & Anor [2000] ScotCS 162 (14 June 2000)

Ritchie v Burns & Anor [2000] ScotCS 162 (14 June 2000)

The trustee is entitled to authority to sell the family home as the statutory criteria are met, the interests of creditors and public interest require the sequestration to be concluded, and the hardship to the second defender and her children, while significant, does not justify indefinite postponement. However, the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2000] ScotCS 162
Parties
Pursuer: Graham Ritchie; First Defender: William Burns; Second Defender: Mrs Frances Mary Stewart or Burns
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
14 June 2000
Procedural Posture
Civil Bankruptcy (trustee Application) / Judgment After Proof (trial)
Outcome
Application granted with postponement
Legal Topics
Trustee's Power to Sell Family Home, Division and Sale of Jointly Owned Property, Sequestration, Interests of Creditors Vs. Family Occupants, Section 40 Bankruptcy (scotland) Act 1985
Bankruptcy Property Law Family Law Trustee's Power to Sell Family Home Division and Sale of Jointly Owned Property Sequestration Interests of Creditors Vs. Family Occupants Section 40 Bankruptcy (scotland) Act 1985

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 9
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Graham Ritchie

Pursuer

William Burns

First Defender

Mrs Frances Mary Stewart or Burns

Second Defender

Procedural Posture

Civil Bankruptcy (trustee Application) / Judgment After Proof (trial)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the trustee should be granted authority to sell the family home under section 40(1) of the Bankruptcy (Scotland) Act 1985
  2. 2 Whether the interests of the second defender and her children outweigh the interests of creditors and public interest in the sale
  3. 3 Whether the sale should be postponed and for how long

Ratio Decidendi

The trustee is entitled to authority to sell the family home as the statutory criteria are met, the interests of creditors and public interest require the sequestration to be concluded, and the hardship to the second defender and her children, while significant, does not justify indefinite postponement. However, the sale should be postponed for six months to allow the second defender to make alternative arrangements.

Court Disposition

Application granted with postponement

Orders

  • Authority granted to trustee to sell the family home at 18 Shore Road, South Queensferry, under section 40(1) of the Bankruptcy (Scotland) Act 1985, but execution of sale postponed for six months.