Rossi v. Magistrates of Edinburgh [1903] ScotLR 40_375 (20 February 1903)

Rossi v. Magistrates of Edinburgh [1903] ScotLR 40_375 (20 February 1903)

The Magistrates of Edinburgh did not act ultra vires in imposing the challenged conditions on ice-cream shop licences, as the conditions either reflected statutory prohibitions or were within the reasonable discretion conferred by the statute. The power to revoke or suspend was implied by the Act, and the conditions did not exceed statutory authority.

Citation
[1903] ScotLR 40_375
Parties
Pursuer and Reclaimer: Francisco Rossi; Defenders and Respondents: Lord Provost and Bailies of the City of Edinburgh (Magistrates of Edinburgh), Town Clerk, Depute Town Clerk, and the Corporation of the City of Edinburgh
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
20 February 1903
Procedural Posture
Civil (declarator and Interdict) / Inner House, Second Division, Reclaiming Motion (appeal)
Outcome
Reclaiming motion refused; interlocutor of Lord Ordinary adhered to; defenders assoilzied (absolved) from the conclusions of the summons.
Legal Topics
Ultra Vires, Licensing Conditions, Discretion of Licensing Authorities, Statutory Interpretation, Municipal Regulation
Administrative Law Licensing Law Local Government Law Ultra Vires Licensing Conditions Discretion of Licensing Authorities Statutory Interpretation Municipal Regulation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Francisco Rossi

Pursuer and Reclaimer

Lord Provost and Bailies of the City of Edinburgh (Magistrates of Edinburgh), Town Clerk, Depute Town Clerk, and the Corporation of the City of Edinburgh

Defenders and Respondents

Procedural Posture

Civil (declarator and Interdict) / Inner House, Second Division, Reclaiming Motion (appeal)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Magistrates of Edinburgh acted ultra vires in imposing conditions on ice-cream shop licences beyond those expressly stated in the Edinburgh Corporation Act 1900 as amended.
  2. 2 Whether the conditions prohibiting Sunday opening, restricting hours, and allowing revocation or suspension of licence were lawful.

Ratio Decidendi

The Magistrates of Edinburgh did not act ultra vires in imposing the challenged conditions on ice-cream shop licences, as the conditions either reflected statutory prohibitions or were within the reasonable discretion conferred by the statute. The power to revoke or suspend was implied by the Act, and the conditions did not exceed statutory authority.

Court Disposition

Reclaiming motion refused; interlocutor of Lord Ordinary adhered to; defenders assoilzied (absolved) from the conclusions of the summons.

Orders

  • Declarator and interdict refused.
  • Defenders absolved from all conclusions.