Farquhar & Gill v. Aberdeen Magistrates [1912] ScotLR 975 (13 July 1912)
It was ultra vires for the Town Council of Aberdeen to impose or levy any assessment or rates under the local water Acts for the purpose of paying expenses incurred in promoting an unsuccessful Provisional Order and Private Bill for a new water supply; ratepayers have title to sue to prevent such unlawful expenditure; the limitation provisions of the Public Authorities Protection Act 1893 do not bar the remedy of interdict in these circumstances.
- Citation
- [1912] ScotLR 975
- Parties
- Complainers: Farquhar & Gill and others; Respondents: Lord Provost, Magistrates, and Town Council of the City of Aberdeen
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 13 July 1912
- Procedural Posture
- Note of Suspension and Interdict / Inner House, First Division, on Reclaiming Motion (appeal) From Lord Ordinary
- Outcome
- Interlocutor of Lord Ordinary recalled; respondents' pleas-in-law repelled; finding that respondents not entitled to impose or levy rates for the impugned purpose; cause continued.
- Legal Topics
- Ultra Vires, Rates and Assessments, Burgh Law, Statutory Interpretation, Title to Sue
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Farquhar & Gill and others
Complainers
Lord Provost, Magistrates, and Town Council of the City of Aberdeen
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Note of Suspension and Interdict / Inner House, First Division, on Reclaiming Motion (appeal) From Lord Ordinary
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Town Council of Aberdeen acted ultra vires in imposing assessments or levying rates to pay for expenses of an unsuccessful Provisional Order and Private Bill for a new water supply.
- 2 Whether ratepayers had title to sue to prevent such expenditure.
- 3 Whether the Public Authorities Protection Act 1893 barred the action.
Ratio Decidendi
It was ultra vires for the Town Council of Aberdeen to impose or levy any assessment or rates under the local water Acts for the purpose of paying expenses incurred in promoting an unsuccessful Provisional Order and Private Bill for a new water supply; ratepayers have title to sue to prevent such unlawful expenditure; the limitation provisions of the Public Authorities Protection Act 1893 do not bar the remedy of interdict in these circumstances.
Court Disposition
Interlocutor of Lord Ordinary recalled; respondents' pleas-in-law repelled; finding that respondents not entitled to impose or levy rates for the impugned purpose; cause continued.
Orders
- Recall of Lord Ordinary's interlocutor.
- Repelling of respondents' pleas-in-law.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment