Baillie Marshall Ltd & Anor v Avian Communications Ltd [2000] ScotCS 209 (21 July 2000)

Baillie Marshall Ltd & Anor v Avian Communications Ltd [2000] ScotCS 209 (21 July 2000)

Section 243 does not provide a basis for a claim of damages against a third party where the preference to the creditors is left untouched; the statutory remedies are limited to undoing the preference and restoring the company's asset position. The pursuers' pleadings did not sufficiently aver collusion or prejudice, and the claim for compensation against the defender was not competent under the Act.

Citation
[2000] ScotCS 209
Parties
Pursuer: Baillie Marshall Limited; Pursuer: Another (Second Pursuer); Defender: Avian Communications Limited
Jurisdiction
Scotland
Judgment Date
21 July 2000
Procedural Posture
Civil (company/insolvency) / Procedure Roll (plea to Relevancy and Specification)
Outcome
Action dismissed
Legal Topics
Unfair Preference, Liquidation, Section 243 Insolvency Act 1986, Remedies for Challengeable Transactions, Creditor Prejudice
Insolvency Law Company Law Unfair Preference Liquidation Section 243 Insolvency Act 1986 Remedies for Challengeable Transactions Creditor Prejudice

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 14 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 11
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Baillie Marshall Limited

Pursuer

Another (Second Pursuer)

Pursuer

Avian Communications Limited

Defender

Procedural Posture

Civil (company/insolvency) / Procedure Roll (plea to Relevancy and Specification)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether a transaction resulting in payment to certain creditors constituted an unfair preference under section 243 of the Insolvency Act 1986
  2. 2 Whether a claim for damages against a third party (not the preferred creditor) is competent under section 243(5)
  3. 3 Whether the exceptions in section 243(2)(b) and (c) apply to the transaction

Ratio Decidendi

Section 243 does not provide a basis for a claim of damages against a third party where the preference to the creditors is left untouched; the statutory remedies are limited to undoing the preference and restoring the company's asset position. The pursuers' pleadings did not sufficiently aver collusion or prejudice, and the claim for compensation against the defender was not competent under the Act.

Court Disposition

Action dismissed

Orders

  • Sustained the defender's first plea-in-law
  • Dismissed the action