Scott v. Thomson & Anor [2002] ScotCS 309 (06 December 2002)
A landlord is strictly liable under section 36 of the Housing (Scotland) Act 1988 for unlawful eviction by any person acting on their behalf, regardless of the landlord's knowledge, instruction, or ratification. The agent's authority to manage and administer the property was absolute, and the statutory language does not require proof of knowledge or ratification. The statutory defence was not established. The Sheriff Principal erred in law by importing a requirement of knowledge or ratification.
- Citation
- [2002] ScotCS 309
- Parties
- Pursuer and Appellant: Mrs. Jessie Scott; First Defender and Respondent: Colin Thomson; Second Defender and Respondent: Florence Thomson
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 06 December 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Appeal From Sheriff Principal's Decision to the Inner House, Court of Session
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed. Sheriff's original judgment restored.
- Legal Topics
- Unlawful Eviction, Statutory Interpretation, Vicarious Liability, Damages Assessment, Agency
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mrs. Jessie Scott
Pursuer and Appellant
Colin Thomson
First Defender and Respondent
Florence Thomson
Second Defender and Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Appeal From Sheriff Principal's Decision to the Inner House, Court of Session
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a landlord is strictly liable under section 36 of the Housing (Scotland) Act 1988 for unlawful eviction by an agent acting on their behalf, regardless of the landlord's knowledge or ratification.
- 2 Whether the Sheriff Principal erred in law by requiring knowledge, instruction, or ratification by the landlord for liability under section 36.
- 3 Whether the actions of George Thomson constituted acting 'on behalf' of the landlords within the meaning of section 36.
Ratio Decidendi
A landlord is strictly liable under section 36 of the Housing (Scotland) Act 1988 for unlawful eviction by any person acting on their behalf, regardless of the landlord's knowledge, instruction, or ratification. The agent's authority to manage and administer the property was absolute, and the statutory language does not require proof of knowledge or ratification. The statutory defence was not established. The Sheriff Principal erred in law by importing a requirement of knowledge or ratification.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed. Sheriff's original judgment restored.
Orders
- Recall the interlocutor of the Sheriff Principal dated 22 June 2001.
- Restore the Sheriff's interlocutors of 4 and 30 May 2000.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment