ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS LTD AGAINST GREATER GLASGOW HEALTH BOARD AND ANOTHER [2024] ScotCS CSOH_55 (05 June 2024)
The pursuer's averments, if proved, disclose a relevant case of constructive intent for unlawful means conspiracy and causing loss by unlawful means. The alleged breach of procurement regulations and anticipatory breach of contract constitute unlawful means. The pursuer has sufficiently pled causation and loss, and...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] ScotCS CSOH_55
- Parties
- Pursuer: Roche Diagnostics Limited; First Defender: Greater Glasgow Health Board; Second Defender: Abbott Laboratories Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 05 June 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Action / Opinion on Relevancy Debate
- Outcome
- Pursuer's averments admitted to probation; defenders' motions refused; all parties' pleas as to relevancy reserved.
- Legal Topics
- Unlawful Means Conspiracy, Causing Loss by Unlawful Means, Breach of Statutory Duty, Anticipatory Breach of Contract, Contract Modification, Tender Process
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Roche Diagnostics Limited
Pursuer
Greater Glasgow Health Board
First Defender
Abbott Laboratories Limited
Second Defender
Procedural Posture
Commercial Action / Opinion on Relevancy Debate
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the pursuer's averments disclose a relevant case of unlawful means conspiracy
- 2 Whether the pursuer's averments disclose a relevant case of causing loss by unlawful means
- 3 Whether breach of the Public Contracts (Scotland) Regulations 2015 constitutes 'unlawful means' for the purposes of economic torts
Ratio Decidendi
The pursuer's averments, if proved, disclose a relevant case of constructive intent for unlawful means conspiracy and causing loss by unlawful means. The alleged breach of procurement regulations and anticipatory breach of contract constitute unlawful means. The pursuer has sufficiently pled causation and loss, and knowledge of unlawfulness is not required for liability. The defenders' arguments on intention, blameworthiness, and specification do not render the pursuer's pleadings irrelevant at this stage.
Court Disposition
Pursuer's averments admitted to probation; defenders' motions refused; all parties' pleas as to relevancy reserved.
Orders
- Pursuer's pleadings on unlawful means conspiracy and causing loss by unlawful means admitted to probation.
- Defenders' motions to refuse admission of pursuer's averments refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment