Latham and Others v. Glasgow Corporation [1921] ScotLR 501 (25 May 1921)
Section 5(1) of the Temperance (Scotland) Act 1913 does not forbid the issue of requisition papers to a non-elector; the provision is enabling, not restrictive. The statutory requirements were substantially fulfilled, and the technical irregularity alleged did not affect the validity of the requisition or the poll. The pursuers' averments disclosed no relevant case in fact or law.
- Citation
- [1921] ScotLR 501
- Parties
- Pursuers: Harry Latham and Others; Defenders: Glasgow Corporation, Sir James Watson Stewart, Sir John Lindsay
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 25 May 1921
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Action for Reduction/declarator / Appeal (reclaiming Motion) From Lord Ordinary to Inner House
- Outcome
- Action dismissed; judgment for defenders affirmed.
- Legal Topics
- Validity of Statutory Poll Requisition, Construction of Temperance (scotland) Act 1913 S.5(1), Issuance of Requisition Forms to Non Electors, Procedural Irregularity and Statutory Compliance
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Harry Latham and Others
Pursuers
Glasgow Corporation, Sir James Watson Stewart, Sir John Lindsay
Defenders
Procedural Posture
Civil Action for Reduction/declarator / Appeal (reclaiming Motion) From Lord Ordinary to Inner House
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether requisition papers for a statutory poll must be issued only to electors under s.5(1) of the Temperance (Scotland) Act 1913
- 2 Whether issuing requisition forms to a non-elector invalidates the poll and subsequent proceedings
Ratio Decidendi
Section 5(1) of the Temperance (Scotland) Act 1913 does not forbid the issue of requisition papers to a non-elector; the provision is enabling, not restrictive. The statutory requirements were substantially fulfilled, and the technical irregularity alleged did not affect the validity of the requisition or the poll. The pursuers' averments disclosed no relevant case in fact or law.
Court Disposition
Action dismissed; judgment for defenders affirmed.
Orders
- Sustain first plea-in-law for defenders; action dismissed as irrelevant.
- Defenders entitled to expenses as between agent and client.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment