Moss' Empires, Ltd v. Walker and Others [1916] ScotLR 298 (18 January 1916)
By majority, the Court held that an action for reduction of a valuation roll entry and declarator as to the correct value is competent where the assessor failed to send the statutory notice of increase, as this failure deprived the proprietor of the statutory right of appeal and is not a mere informality protected by section 30 of the 1854 Act. The roll is not conclusive where a fundamental statutory safeguard has not been observed.
- Citation
- [1916] ScotLR 298
- Parties
- Pursuer: Moss' Empires, Limited; Defender: Alexander Walker, Assessor of the City of Glasgow; Defender: Sir Daniel Macaulay Stevenson, Lord Provost of the City, and others, Valuation Committee of the City; Defender: Corporation of the City of Glasgow
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 18 January 1916
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Appeal (reclaiming Motion) From Lord Ordinary to Inner House, Heard by Bench of Seven Judges
- Outcome
- By majority, interlocutor of Lord Ordinary recalled; action allowed to proceed to proof of averments (except as to value).
- Legal Topics
- Valuation Roll, Statutory Notice Requirements, Judicial Review of Administrative Action, Finality of Valuation Roll, Interpretation of Statutes
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Moss' Empires, Limited
Pursuer
Alexander Walker, Assessor of the City of Glasgow
Defender
Sir Daniel Macaulay Stevenson, Lord Provost of the City, and others, Valuation Committee of the City
Defender
Corporation of the City of Glasgow
Defender
Procedural Posture
Civil / Appeal (reclaiming Motion) From Lord Ordinary to Inner House, Heard by Bench of Seven Judges
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether failure by the assessor to send statutory notice of increased valuation to the proprietor renders the valuation roll entry challengeable or void.
- 2 Whether the Court of Session has jurisdiction to reduce or alter an entry in the valuation roll on grounds of procedural non-compliance by the assessor.
Ratio Decidendi
By majority, the Court held that an action for reduction of a valuation roll entry and declarator as to the correct value is competent where the assessor failed to send the statutory notice of increase, as this failure deprived the proprietor of the statutory right of appeal and is not a mere informality protected by section 30 of the 1854 Act. The roll is not conclusive where a fundamental statutory safeguard has not been observed.
Court Disposition
By majority, interlocutor of Lord Ordinary recalled; action allowed to proceed to proof of averments (except as to value).
Orders
- Recall of Lord Ordinary's interlocutor dismissing the action.
- Allow proof of pursuers' averments except as regards the annual value of the subjects in question.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment