Burghead Harbour Co., Ltd v. George (Collector of duffus parish) [1906] ScotLR 43_754 (26 June 1906)
Dredging expenses are necessary to maintain the harbour in its actual state and are deductible under section 37; the annual value in the valuation roll is conclusive and deductions must be made from it; only owner's rates and taxes for the year are deductible, not occupier's or averages.
- Citation
- [1906] ScotLR 43_754
- Parties
- Complainer/respondent: Burghead Harbour Company, Limited; Respondent/reclaimer: Joseph Stuart George (Collector of Poor Rates for the Parish of Duffus)
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 26 June 1906
- Procedural Posture
- Suspension and Interdict / Inner House Appeal From Lord Ordinary's Interlocutor
- Outcome
- Court adhered to Lord Ordinary's interlocutor; respondent's objections repelled; deductions for dredging allowed; only owner's rates/taxes deductible.
- Legal Topics
- Valuation for Rating, Deduction of Expenses, Assessment of Harbours, Poor Law Amendment (scotland) Act 1845, Valuation of Lands (scotland) Act 1854
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Burghead Harbour Company, Limited
Complainer/respondent
Joseph Stuart George (Collector of Poor Rates for the Parish of Duffus)
Respondent/reclaimer
Procedural Posture
Suspension and Interdict / Inner House Appeal From Lord Ordinary's Interlocutor
Legal Issues
- 1 Are deductions for dredging expenses allowable under section 37 of the Poor Law Amendment (Scotland) Act 1845 when assessing a harbour for poor rates?
- 2 Is the annual value in the valuation roll conclusive for assessment purposes?
- 3 Are only owner's rates and taxes deductible, or both owner's and occupier's?
Ratio Decidendi
Dredging expenses are necessary to maintain the harbour in its actual state and are deductible under section 37; the annual value in the valuation roll is conclusive and deductions must be made from it; only owner's rates and taxes for the year are deductible, not occupier's or averages.
Court Disposition
Court adhered to Lord Ordinary's interlocutor; respondent's objections repelled; deductions for dredging allowed; only owner's rates/taxes deductible.
Orders
- Affirmed Lord Ordinary's interlocutor on the two objections reviewed.
- Deductions for dredging expenses allowed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment