Dante v. Walker and Others [1921] ScotLR 101 (10 December 1921)
The action was dismissed as incompetent and irrelevant because the pursuer failed to exhaust the statutory remedy of appeal against his entry in the valuation roll, and did not aver any special circumstances justifying bypassing that remedy. The lease constituted a tenancy of lands and heritages, and the pursuer was properly entered as tenant and occupier. Liability for assessment is determined by the rating statutes, not by the valuation roll alone, and the pursuer's pleadings did not address the relevant assessing statutes.
- Citation
- [1921] ScotLR 101
- Parties
- Pursuer: Alfred Dante; Defender: Alexander Walker, Assessor of the Royal Burgh of Ayr; Defender: Provost, Magistrates, and Councillors of the Royal Burgh of Ayr; Defender: Thomas Lindsay Robb, Town Chamberlain, Ayr, Collector of the burgh general and other assessments of the Royal Burgh of Ayr; Defender: Parish Council of Ayr; Defender: Robert Pyper, Collector of the said Parish Council
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judgment Date
- 10 December 1921
- Procedural Posture
- Action of Declarator and Interdict / Inner House Appeal (reclaiming Note) From Lord Ordinary's Dismissal
- Outcome
- Action dismissed as incompetent and irrelevant
- Legal Topics
- Valuation Roll Entries, Liability for Rates and Taxes, Competency of Action, Appeals Under Valuation Acts, Seasonal Leases, Tenant and Occupier Definitions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Alfred Dante
Pursuer
Alexander Walker, Assessor of the Royal Burgh of Ayr
Defender
Provost, Magistrates, and Councillors of the Royal Burgh of Ayr
Defender
Thomas Lindsay Robb, Town Chamberlain, Ayr, Collector of the burgh general and other assessments of the Royal Burgh of Ayr
Defender
Parish Council of Ayr
Defender
Robert Pyper, Collector of the said Parish Council
Defender
Procedural Posture
Action of Declarator and Interdict / Inner House Appeal (reclaiming Note) From Lord Ordinary's Dismissal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the pursuer was properly entered in the valuation roll as tenant and occupier for the purposes of the Valuation of Lands (Scotland) Acts
- 2 Whether the pursuer is liable to be rated or assessed in respect of the stances as tenant or occupier
- 3 Whether the action is competent given the pursuer's failure to exhaust statutory remedies
Ratio Decidendi
The action was dismissed as incompetent and irrelevant because the pursuer failed to exhaust the statutory remedy of appeal against his entry in the valuation roll, and did not aver any special circumstances justifying bypassing that remedy. The lease constituted a tenancy of lands and heritages, and the pursuer was properly entered as tenant and occupier. Liability for assessment is determined by the rating statutes, not by the valuation roll alone, and the pursuer's pleadings did not address the relevant assessing statutes.
Court Disposition
Action dismissed as incompetent and irrelevant
Orders
- Action dismissed
- No decree of declarator or interdict granted
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment